LOS MODELOS DE SEPARACIÓN DE PODERES Y SU INFLUENCIA EN EL MODELO DE ADMINISTRACIÓN PÚBLICA

Abstract

I. Introduction.
II. A simple theory and a complex reality; A. Origins and formulation; B. Criticisms; C. The three models.
III. The British model; A. The sovereignty of Parliament; B. The separation between the judges and Parliament; C. The absence of
constitutional control; D. The separation between Parliament and the executive branch;
IV. The French model; A. Constitutional instability and administrative stability; B. The French notion of separation of powers and the origin of the contentious-administrative jurisdiction; C. The consolidation and evolution of the Council of State; D. The Constitution of the Fifth Republic; E. The control of constitutionality;
V. The North American model; A. The foundations of the system and its subsequent evolution; B. The institutional role of the Supreme Court; C. Two theories; D. The functional interpretation, i. The control of constitutionality; ii. The legislative delegation; iii. The
“doctrine of deference”; IV. executive agreements; v. The judicial tasks of the Administration. The so-called “primary jurisdiction”; E. The formal interpretation, i. The legislative veto and the “Chadha” case; ii. The removal of executive officials by Congress; iii. The Steel seizure case; F. The so-called “administrative state”;
SAW. Three models of Administration?;
VII. Conclusions