LAS INJUSTICIAS QUE (TODAVÍA) NO VEMOS

Abstract

The iron defense of due process, central to any constitutional state, seems today the last "trench" that remains or remains for those who defend (or defend) the constitutional doctrine with its basic plexus of rights and guarantees. In any serious republic, the defense of guarantees (social, human, labor, economic, not only procedural) is obvious. In Argentina, no. It is or represents a fickleness of "guarantors". Alberdi's constitution is guaranteeist, because guaranteeism was and is a liberal, egalitarian philosophy. The obvious defense of due process (with its basic rights, such as defense in court, equality before the law, the presumption of innocence, no extortion of "repentant", no "preventive" prisoners in "wired" and degrading prisons) does not it is, however, essential in any serious republic, the first nor the most central of the ideas of "guaranteeism", although today it seems, precisely because of the speeches that corner it (and corner all human rights lawyers). flying it) reduced to it. Guaranteeism is much more than the sole defense of due process, although today it may not seem so